- From: Doyle Burnett <dburnett@sesa.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:59:22 -0900
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, W3C Web Content <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Regrets On 3/30/04 8:29 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > > Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern > Australia) > Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 > irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag > > > This weeks agenda will be focus on Ian's comments and the Conformance issues > and strategies that we didn’t get to last week. > > 1 - Ian's posting. > > 2 - Should there be intermediate between 1 and 2 and 3 > (Current requirements doc conformance statement says yes so if we come to > different consensus we need to change requirements doc) > > 3 - Should definitions of how we sorted into levels 1, 2 and 3 be updated? > - do we want to stick with L1 is only invisible > > 4 - Should checklists be normative? What are the issues? > > 5 - whether conformance should be based on technology status at time WCAG > becomes official or whether we should lean into the future. > > > > > See you Thursday. > > Gregg > > ------------------------ > Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. > Director - Trace R & D Center > University of Wisconsin-Madison > <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 > For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 20:13:44 UTC