- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:11:08 -0500 (EST)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: 'Wendy A Chisholm' <wendy@w3.org>, 'WAI GL' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, nabe@lab.twcu.ac.jp
That seems like a strange meaning of located. If the goal is really just to be able to point someone in a rough direction that includes the answer, I suggest that the wording reflect that distinction more carefully. Chaals On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > >There seems to be some confusion between "located" and "determined" as >defined in the latest draft, > >"Located" includes finding the proper definition in a list of definitions. >It does not require that the proper definition be indicated. > >"Determined" is a tougher requirement. It means that the specific >definition is indicated. > >"Located" does not let you determine the exact meaning unless there is only >one meaning for a word. > > >Gregg > > -- ------------------------------ >Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. >Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. >Director - Trace R & D Center >University of Wisconsin-Madison > Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 02:11:31 UTC