- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:34:35 -0000
- To: "'Jens Meiert'" <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, "'W3C WAI'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Just wanted to note that in my original mail, sent on behalf of the i18n WG, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2003Sep/0014.html there were two additional points made. - change of order of material - obsoletion of rfc1766 Thanks. RI > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jens Meiert > Sent: 24 February 2004 14:38 > To: W3C WAI > Subject: [wcag2] Language definition ('lang'/'xml:lang') > > > > Hi all, > > > I want to emphasize the importance of an appropriate WAI > statement related to language definition again (although > there already is a request by Ben Caldwell [1]), since the > WCAG still say > > 'If you use a number of different languages on a page, make sure > that any changes in language are clearly identified by using the > lang attribute.' [2] > > This makes it impossible to 'validate' a document against > these guidelines when it's XHTML 1.1 compliant, since XHTML > 1.1 clearly imposes > > 'On every element, the lang attribute has been removed in favor > of the xml:lang attribute (as defined in [XHTMLMOD]).' [3] > > consequently throwing an error if you use the 'lang' > attribute. Due to the increasing amount of XHTML 1.1 > documents it seems absolutely necessary to adapt the > guidelines, not only to demonstrate the technical sensitiveness ;) > > > All the best, > Jens. > > > [1] http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=578 > [2] > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-> HTML-TECHS/#lang-att_change > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/changes.html > > > -- > Jens Meiert > Interface Architect > http://meiert.com/
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 10:34:41 UTC