- From: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:39:37 +0200
- To: 'Wendy A Chisholm' <wendy@w3.org>, 'Joe Clark' <joeclark@joeclark.org>, 'WAI-GL' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
There is one big catch, is that the proprietary technology needs to meet WCAG 2.0 on _the platform of the users choice_. When a proprietary technology allows you to meet WCAG but only for users on using a given operating system (say you have to be on Windows) then the effect is a lot less accessible then the page was WCAG conformant using a W3C technology. Also note that in poorer countries free platforms (read Lynix)are starting to take off in schools ect. It seems a bit limiting that to read a website you may need an expensive operating system. Side note: Someone needs to create an open rapper for API's to the operating system and platform. I am not sure though that it is the WAI... All the best Lisa Seeman Visit us at the UB Access website UB Access - Moving internet accessibility > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:04 AM > To: Joe Clark; WAI-GL > Subject: Re: [4.1] Overview and summary of guideline 4.1 > > > > At 06:49 PM 1/20/2004, Joe Clark wrote: > >Yvette Hoitink wrote: > >> Applicability to non-W3C technologies > >> > >>...Do we allow the use of proprietary technologies? > > > >WAI needs to resolve that issue quickly, if only because PDF > and Flash > >are > >two non-W3C formats with accessibility built in. (There are > lots of those. > >DVD, for example.) WAI has flirted with these dangerous and alien > >technologies before in its guidelines: > > > ><http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG-PDF-TECHS-20010913/Overview.html> > >PDF Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 and 2.0 > > > >I know that document is orphaned, but it's important for WAI > to decide > >if > >it's going to publish accessibility guidelines for other > formats. *I* > >think it should. > > There are two issues: > 1. Allowing an author using non-W3C technologies to claim > conformance to > WCAG 2.0 > 2. Publishing techniques for non-W3C technologies > > WRT 1 - We encourage authors to make accessible content and > we encourage > technology developers to build accessibility features into their > technology. If a technology can be used to meet WCAG 2.0, it > should not > matter who designed the technology. > > WRT 2 - Because we are a vendor-neutral organization, the > W3C/WAI will > only publish techniques for open specifications that are > produced by a > consortium. The scope of our charter says, "Develop techniques for > implementing the WCAG 2.0 in W3C Recommendations (such as > XHTML, SMIL, SVG, > and MathML) as well as ECMAScript." [1] The WCAG WG is not likely to > address *all* W3C technologies and we encourage other W3C > Working Groups to > write authoring techniques for their specifications (some groups have > expressed interest in doing this). The WCAG WG (in > coordination with the > I18N WG) provides a schema, data and transformations [2] that > may be used > to produce techniques documents. It is my understanding that > Adobe and > Macromedia plan to publish techniques documents for PDF and Flash > (respectively). > > --wendy > > [1] <http://www.w3.org/2003/08/wcag-charter.html#scope> > [2] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wcag20.html#techs> > > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ > /-- > >
Received on Sunday, 25 January 2004 02:40:20 UTC