W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Comments on draft. part 1.

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 19:36:21 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: "Mirabella, Mathew J" <Mathew.Mirabella@team.telstra.com>, "w3c-wai-gl list" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

>Status of this document.
>Paragraph 2
>Spelling / typo error.
>         ...to show how more generalized (less HTML-specific) WCAG 
> guielines might read. This draft is not yet based on consensus of the 
> WCAG Working Group...

fixed in the latest working draft:

>3 - Bottom layer - Technology-specific application information
>is there any direction to incorporate mathML, or WAP in this list?  (I 
>understand that it depends on who can contribute to this etc.).  There are 
>a number of mobile handsets with adaptive technology availabel (i.e. nokia 
>phones with talx) so accessibility of content in WAP may be important.

would be great. but, we need to get our core set of techniques first (html, 
css, scripting).  then we're aiming for rdf, svg, voicexml.  the techniques 
submission form should be ready to use in the near future so if people have 
techniques for mobile devices, they can submit them.  then we need to find 
someone who can facilitate a draft (vet submitted techniques, incorporate 
them into a document).

>Also, are we going to include anything like PDF or Flash in this set.  (I 
>understand that these are not w3c technologies, but can we get techniques 
>for these or at least link to existing good ones).

it is up to macromedia and adobe to provide these. refer to discussion from 

I'll incorporate your issues and suggestions related to conformance into 
the summary i'm providing for the F2F.


wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 19:36:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC