- From: Yvette P. Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:52:46 +0100
- To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi everyone, Gregg Vanderheiden suggested the following edit for the definition of testable: [1] Reliably human is not very clear. I suggest we change this to "are testable (by machine or by humans with high consistency)". Personally, I don't know many men that have high consistency ;-) I know that's not the way the sentence was meant to be read but I did find it funny to read it this way. I think this should be rewritten and am glad John Slatin already proposed a new wording [2]. Yvette Hoitink CEO Heritas, Enschede, The Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0364.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/0401.html
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 15:52:54 UTC