On Feb 26, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Gian Sampson-Wild (PurpleTop) wrote: > There are a lot of companies (such as Disability service providers) > that > put a lot of effort into maintaining a Triple-A rating, and want to be > seen to be providing as much accessibility as possible. I believe that > allowing a Triple-A rating will give something to aim for. I don't think that's reason enough to open it up to the abuse of triple-A, which is orders of magnitude more common. Disability-oriented sites have better reasons to implement everything they can than just to score a triple-A, and most of them aren't going to do any less just because there isn't a triple-A-like level. To put it another way, those who do care will do the best they can in any case -- even if we have no conformance levels at all. We have to be concerned with everybody else. - mReceived on Thursday, 26 February 2004 16:49:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC