- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:00:59 -0600
- To: 'Wendy A Chisholm' <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Yes -- for html that is the kind of thing. It has to allow cascading -- which could be done by order. The other question would be whether the glossary had to be machine readable... (so the word could be found). Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: Wendy A Chisholm [mailto:wendy@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 9:54 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: FW: UBER 3.1 proposal Improved At 01:20 AM 2/22/2004, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > >The following text for levels 1 and 2 was the result of the working >group call last Thursday. > > snip. >One technique that is being explored is the use of the cascading >dictionaries directly associated with the content. > >NOTE: This provision is dependent on the definition of a standard way to >associate dictionaries and the availability of on-line dictionaries. Would the glossary link type satisfy this? http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links <link rel="glossary" href="glossary1.html"/> -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 11:00:58 UTC