- From: John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:37:51 -0600
- To: "Yvette P. Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yvette, thanks for continuing to think about this one! The context of my question about whether or not all Web documents have source documents (along the lines of thos4e for static HTML/XHTML documents) was my work on guideline 3.2 (formerly 3.4), the one about organizing content in consistent ways and making interactive components behave predictably. Specifically, I was trying to find a way to phrase a success criterion that would allow us to require at least one presentation format in which repeated components such as navigation bars, search forms, sections within main content, etc., would have to occur in the same order. The model I was working from was that of <div>-basedWeb pages where screen readers speak the elements in the order in which they appear in the source document. Developers are free to arrange the elements *visually* in whatever order makes most sense visually, while the same components might be read in a different order by screen readers based on the order in which they occur in the source document. I was thinking that this would be the auditory equivalent of consistent visual layout. I ended up dropping the success criterion (I think!) because I couldn't come up with wording that seemed meaningful without constraining visual presentation in ways that our self-imposed crteria for levels 1, 2, and 3 would allow. John "Good design is accessible design." Please note our new name and URL! John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ -----Original Message----- From: Yvette P. Hoitink [mailto:y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:11 am To: John M Slatin; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: Is there a source document for every Web resource? Hello John and list, Pictures (jpg, gif, etc) do not have source documents in the regular sense of the word. I don't know if that is a good example, because I do not quite understand the context of the question. Could you explain some more what you need counter-examples for? Also, for PDF the source is the postscript file but authors seldom code these by hand but have a program like Acrobat or PDF distiller that does it for them. Another example might be MP3. You cannot say "view source" there anywhere. The file format of MP3 is a mystery to almost everyone publishing MP3 content so almost no author ever does anything with the source. This is stretching the concept of "host technologies" a bit, but it is content found on the web that in my opinion does not have a source document in any way the author has influence over. Hope this helps, Yvette Hoitink CEO Heritas, Enschede, The Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2004 11:37:52 UTC