- From: Kerstin Goldsmith <kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:04:06 -0800
- To: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Cc: "'Ian B. Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <40688F46.4050205@oracle.com>
Another vote for Ian's proposal - can we make an agenda item of this for this or next Thursday? I believe that Ian might just be correct in thinking that this might speed up and simplify the WCAG 2.0 timeline. Cheers, -Kerstin lisa seeman wrote: >My vote is with Ian too on this- it is more then techniques to conform >to WCAG. If we want to change WCAG to be more like XAG however.... >All the best >Lisa Seeman > >Visit us at the UB Access website >UB Access - Moving internet accessibility > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org >>[mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian B. Jacobs >>Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 4:28 PM >>To: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG >>Cc: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; 'Judy Brewer' >>Subject: Re: FW: Mock-up of merged WCAG 2.0 and XAG >> >> >>On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 03:51, Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG wrote: >> >> >>>XAG could become a Techniques Document for WCAG 2.0.... >>>Like HTML, CSS, etc. techniques. >>>What do you think about this proposal? >>> >>> >>I think XAG requirements deserve to be at the same level >>as WCAG requirements. >> >>In the proposal linked below, the basic idea is that >>WCAG 2.0 would say "To build accessible content, you start >>with a format that supports accessibility." What defines >>"an accessible format"? Another series of requirements that >>are already well-known to the WAI Community: >> >> * if the format supports audio, it must also support >> the ability to associate a synchronized transcript. >> * if the format supports images, it must also support >> text equivalents, >> >>And so forth. These are some of the XAG requirements today. >>They themselves have techniques associated with them: >> >> * What's a good way to allow authors to provide alternatives? >> The "alt" approach of HTML or the "switch" element of SMIL? >> What are the advantages of each approach? >> >> _ Ian >> >> >> >>>>[2] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/12-ij-wcag20.html >>>> >>>> >>-- >>Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >>Tel: +1 718 260-9447 >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 16:14:07 UTC