W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent links,

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:19:17 +0100
Message-ID: <012501c40225$fe080340$0300a8c0@iwars>
To: "David MacDonald" <befree@magma.ca>, "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Wendy A Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>, "'Michael Cooper'" <michaelc@watchfire.com>, <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David MacDonald" <befree@magma.ca>
To: "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>; "'Roberto Scano -
IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; "'Wendy A
Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>; "'Michael Cooper'" <michaelc@watchfire.com>;
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: RE: WCAG version 1.0 guideline 1.5 image maps and 10.5 adjacent

>Roberto said >>There are problems Image Maps and XHTML 1.1 browser
>rendering. All the example was done by HTML 4.01 but in XHTML 1.1">>
>My action item was find a test application in the UAAG test suite or
build a
>test page according to their example and precedent. They did not have
>relevant test page so I built one. They use HTML 4.01 Transitional, I
>it to strict. The test in question is to find out whether we could
>the "until user agents cause" in the (1999) WCAG 1.0. Guidelines 1.5.
>think we should remove it.)

yes I agree... I've only point focus to this big problem that stop the
use of XHTML 1.1

>If the group would like, I would be glad to rerun the test after
>the page to XHTML 1.0 or 1.1. I think that would be addressing a
>issue. But I would be glad to do it. Thanks for the input on that

I think that must be involved also UAAG WG and eventually post the
problem to the browser producers.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 15:20:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC