(not related to David's question): I should clarify that in my previous message I was disagreeing that we need to write a new success criterion and that I believe Guideline 4.1 is sufficient. (responding to David)... David wrote: > Expanding on "Authors should use the TITLE element to identify the > contents of a document" to perhaps identify that when you publish a > report from hard copy to html, one success criteria might be to ask the > question...Are the titles the same? If they are not, why not? Could you explain why this should be a success criterion? I think this is too specific for a success criterion and propose that we generalize the idea and expand on it in Techniques. In other words, we can provide examples and general guidance about writing good titles. Publishing a report online could be one example. >Also, "context-rich titles" is extremely subjective. Yes, "context-rich" is subjective. We could provide guidance in the HTML Techniques document. Best, --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 17:33:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC