- From: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:08:35 +0200
- To: 'Andy Heath' <a.k.heath@shu.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Spot on Andy. We need clear use cases, with definitions of the different disabilities strength and weaknesses. I wrote this up to the list about two years ago Link http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001AprJun/0437.html It may be a good start for dyslexia if somewhat out of date Please don't hate me for saying so but...I would be interested in a interim document (dare I say deliverable) that defined this stuff.. All the best Lisa Seeman Visit us at the UB Access website UB Access - Moving internet accessibility > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Heath [mailto:a.k.heath@shu.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:54 AM > To: lisa seeman > Cc: 'Wendy A Chisholm'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Re: 3.3- time to take a step back? > > > Sorry to just butt in. > > I agree with your main point here Lisa. Maybe > the components of a solution coupld encompass > work outside w3 as well - for example a guideline > and Meta-data on content that work together. > > I'm fairly new to knowing how w3 processes work but > I do know that the way many other people do this stuff > is to focus solutions around use-cases , which I think > is a kind-of half way house between unstructured working > and the completely planned road-map approach. Are there > use-cases for this process somewhere ? > > andy > a.k.heath@shu.ac.uk > > > Looking back at 3.3 and guidelines for designing web content for > > Learning and cognitive disabilities. > > > > Before creating this guideline we have done a review of > clear writing > > guidelines across the world, but, these guidelines were not > concerned > > about issues like freedom of speech and adoptability. Which made it > > easer for them. > > > > > > On the other hand they did not have the advantages that technology > > protocols and innovation can provide. > > > > I think maybe we need to take a step back and have a taskforce to > > explore end to end methodologies for helping learning disabilities > > combined with protocols. > > > > For example lexical linking could work well to allow > simplification at > > the client end, without > > > > However just putting ideas directly into a guideline may not be the > > best way to do it. Ideally one could do something like this: > > > > 1, Build clear problem statement > > 2, Build profiles of who we need to recruit > > 3, Build the taskforce, > > 4, Have a preliminary deliverable of docvument(s) that > clearly state > > parameters and the extent and nature of user needs ,author needs, > > barriers to adoptions. 5, Have a preliminary deliverable of > potential > > directions for solutions and options > > 6, Post review decide on what directions to developed > > (Funding too would help) > > 7, Develop integrated guidelines/ techniques for user > agents, authoring > > tools and content providers > > > > In other words , move away from directly writing the guideline and > > build a road map to address this issue. > > > > It may seem like a long road, but it may, in the end, be > quicker and > > more productive then endless circular arguments. We may > even be able > > to release 2.0 with a place holder to this work. > > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > > > Visit us at the UB Access website > > UB Access - Moving internet accessibility > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > >>[mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm > >>Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 6:26 AM > >>To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > >>Subject: 22 Jan 2004 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes > >> > >> > >> > >>Available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/01/22-minutes.html > >> > >>Action Items > >>ACTION: gregg and ben take first pass at proposal for > >>rewriting 4.1 and 4.2 > >>based on today's discussion. > >>ACTION: gregg propose reorg of 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 > >>ACTION: john determine from list in 3.3 which items apply > >>across all sites > >>(level 2) from those that are less widely applicable (level 3) > >> > >>-- > >>wendy a chisholm > >>world wide web consortium > >>web accessibility initiative > >>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ > >>/-- > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > andy > _______________________________________________ > Andy Heath > Sheffield Hallam University > andy@andyheath.org.uk > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 02:10:20 UTC