- From: lisa seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 08:21:52 +0200
- To: "W3c-Wai-Gl@W3.Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-id: <000201c3ea1e$06ce7ce0$340aa8c0@patirsrv.patir.com>
Hi Folks, diacritic marks - conclusions from ISOC IL We are happy with the current wording and prioritization of the success criteria. :) We would like however to suggest adding a level three criteria that seas the all diacritic marks necessary for pronunciation should be provided, and should be removable at the users request. ISOC IL have also taken a n action item to document what words need what diacritic marks in Hebrew to fulfill the criteria. Background Some languages use diacritic marks to give the pronunciation of a word. In some languages (like Hebrew and Arabic) most spellings, without diacritic marks, can be resolved to more then one word. Use of context enables the average reader to work out what word was intended. Natural language processing used in screen readers can often guess what word is intended without diacritic marks. However all screen readers will often make mistakes. User benefits It is estimated (by ISOC -il - need to get refrences) that 3% of the population have a visually impaired memory which makes reading many words without diacritic marks extremely difficult. This segment of the population can use a screen reader to help them though the reading process. However when the screen reader guess a word incorrectly, they will often be unable to correct the mistake themselves, as guessing different pronunciation of words based on an identical spelling is difficult to impossible for many dyslexics. It should also be remembered that screen readers are difficult to use and are expensive. Vision impaired people using screen readers are also affected by missing diacritic marks. All screen readers will make mistakes, and will pronounce the wrong word. This will occur more often then an incorrect word pronunciation makes grammatical sense. The user then has to guess the meaning of a sentence - by as guessing different pronunciation of words based on an identical spelling. This extra processing time on the users part means that they can not speed up the screen reader, and often have to reread passages. Finally I want to personally thank everyone who help contribute and resolve this difficult issue. All the best Lisa Seeman Visit us at the UB <http://www.ubaccess.com/> Access website UB Access - Moving internet accessibility
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 01:22:28 UTC