> > Question: is there a more accurate way of defining or characterizing > > content which is not designed to appear in a user interface? > > I think 'designed to appear in a user interface' is sufficient, ahem. Or > something like 'designed to be used by human beings' [...] ...assuming that you want to define the scope for WAI guidelines. Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 06:25:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC