Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG writes: > > > >If there is no technical difference I would say that the guidelines > >shouldn't draw any distinction. If it is used by a human being then it > >qualifies as Web content and the guidelines can be applied to it just > >as they apply to other types of content. > > I agree. On the other hand, suppose there is a collection of XML data that is transferred over the Web, but which is not designed or intended to be presented in a user interface. This is the kind of example that is usually treated as not being Web content, and to which the guidelines don't apply. Question: is there a more accurate way of defining or characterizing content which is not designed to appear in a user interface?Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 05:15:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC