- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:15:05 +1100
- To: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG writes: > > > >If there is no technical difference I would say that the guidelines > >shouldn't draw any distinction. If it is used by a human being then it > >qualifies as Web content and the guidelines can be applied to it just > >as they apply to other types of content. > > I agree. On the other hand, suppose there is a collection of XML data that is transferred over the Web, but which is not designed or intended to be presented in a user interface. This is the kind of example that is usually treated as not being Web content, and to which the guidelines don't apply. Question: is there a more accurate way of defining or characterizing content which is not designed to appear in a user interface?
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 05:15:13 UTC