> Question: is there a more accurate way of defining or characterizing > content which is not designed to appear in a user interface? I think 'designed to appear in a user interface' is sufficient, ahem. Or something like 'designed to be used by human beings', assuming you're not creating a document for your own use alone. -- It's interesting that such a discussion starts 'decades' after first efforts to make documents accessible. Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 06:20:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:07:33 UTC