- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:19:31 +0100 (MET)
- To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au
- Cc: rscano@iwa-italy.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Question: is there a more accurate way of defining or characterizing > content which is not designed to appear in a user interface? I think 'designed to appear in a user interface' is sufficient, ahem. Or something like 'designed to be used by human beings', assuming you're not creating a document for your own use alone. -- It's interesting that such a discussion starts 'decades' after first efforts to make documents accessible. Jens. -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect http://meiert.com/
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 06:20:03 UTC