Re: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG?

> Question: is there a more accurate way of defining or characterizing
> content  which is not designed to appear in a user interface?

I think 'designed to appear in a user interface' is sufficient, ahem. Or
something like 'designed to be used by human beings', assuming you're not
creating a document for your own use alone. -- It's interesting that such a
discussion starts 'decades' after first efforts to make documents accessible.


 Jens.


-- 
Jens Meiert
Interface Architect

http://meiert.com/