- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:00:11 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Yvette P. Hoitink" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl> To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:55 PM Subject: RE: Exceptions in guideline formulations (non-urgent) >Respectfully, I disagree with you. I strongly feel we need to keep the >guidelines simple and leave the exceptions to the success criteria. I agree with you but need to be clarify what is a "text equivalent". For me, text equivalent is, for eg, an "alt" attribute, not an empty tag. Remember that is different to have alt=" " and alt=""... second one is empty, first one is a blank space... >As I see it, an empty string is a text equivalent too. So yes, I would >require a decorative image to have a text equivalent: "". I do agree with >you that we need to make this clearer than it is in the current formulation >of the SC. Empty string is not a text equivalent... if it is "empty" it don't contain nothing :)
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 16:01:57 UTC