- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:43:34 -0000
- To: "'lisa seeman'" <seeman@netvision.net.il>, "'W3c-Wai-Gl@W3.Org'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Lisa, When you say "taken a n action item to document what words need what diacritic marks in Hebrew to fulfill the criteria", do you mean that this will only apply to certain words? Seems it would be a tall order to list all such words. When you say, "removable at the users request", do you mean that a browser would have a switch to display/hide such diacritics? How do you see that happening? Cheers, RI -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of lisa seeman Sent: 03 February 2004 06:22 To: W3c-Wai-Gl@W3.Org Subject: diacritic marks Hi Folks, diacritic marks - conclusions from ISOC IL We are happy with the current wording and prioritization of the success criteria. :) We would like however to suggest adding a level three criteria that seas the all diacritic marks necessary for pronunciation should be provided, and should be removable at the users request. ISOC IL have also taken a n action item to document what words need what diacritic marks in Hebrew to fulfill the criteria. Background Some languages use diacritic marks to give the pronunciation of a word. In some languages (like Hebrew and Arabic) most spellings, without diacritic marks, can be resolved to more then one word. Use of context enables the average reader to work out what word was intended. Natural language processing used in screen readers can often guess what word is intended without diacritic marks. However all screen readers will often make mistakes. <snip/>
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:43:50 UTC