- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:01:41 -0600
- To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, "'WCAG List'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Just talked about this today. Backoffice refers to interfaces that are in a place that is only visited by maintenance personnel. It was meant to keep from having servers in closets be wheelchair accessible. It was not meant to apply to web pages served from servers in back offices (closets). Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:49 PM To: WCAG List Subject: Backoffice: must conform to WCAG? Hi, in the italian mailing list about web accessibility we are discussing about backoffice of web sites. I think that if the backoffice is developed with web technologies and use web pages (with forms, links, etc.) must conform to WCAG 1.0 like the "external" (public) pages. A different application is needed for the "core" of the backoffice (if there is a CMS), that is the XHTML/XHTML editor that should conform to ATAG 1.0. Is correct this?
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 23:02:51 UTC