- From: Yvette P. Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:16:39 +0100
- To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
[Yvette asked what text-equivalents are required for illustrative images that can be expressed in words] Roberto Scano suggested: > > Why don't apply: > > <p><img src="imagename.ext" alt=""></p> > <p>Figure 1: Photograph of the backside of the Keizer house > with the Saint Nicholas church in the background</p> > > This could be useful for all... also for people like me me > that can read the description text of the decorative image > instead to try to read the ALT attribute. I know that that would solve this case but it's just an example. I want to know how we want authors to treat illustrations that don't have subscripts since many designers may not want to add a subscript. Especially in level 1, we don't want to tell authors how to present their content so we need to decide what we want as text equivalents for illustrative images that can be expressed in words. Yvette Hoitink Heritas, Enschede, The Netherlands E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
Received on Sunday, 14 March 2004 18:43:04 UTC