public-html@w3.org from March 2012 by author

Adrian Bateman

• RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Wednesday, 14 March)
• RE: implementation of HTML5 context menu (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)

Andreas Kuckartz

• Enabling DRM Task Force Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 15 March)
• Jeff Jaffe on W3C and DRM (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)
• W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Encrypted Media Task Force Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-01: issue progress and heartbeat drafts (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: DOM Parsing and Serialization: which W3C WG? [Was: Re: ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Proposals] (Friday, 2 March)

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Saturday, 24 March)
• Are @posters background images? [Was: Text description for @poster] (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Sunday, 11 March)

Boris Zbarsky

• Spec behavior for img.src sets is not quite web-compatible (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Option element in a Datalist with no label (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)
• <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 16586] New: Accessibility API Role Mapping Matrix missing math and svg elements (Friday, 30 March)
• [Bug 16578] New: Characters appended to temporary buffer are not specified to be lower-cased. But comparisons against this buffer seem to be expecting this. Example: "8.2.4.28 Script data double escape start state" -> "U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN (>)" "If the temporary buff (Friday, 30 March)
• [Bug 16575] New: cors settings attribute - unclear meaning of 'omitted' (Thursday, 29 March)
• [Bug 16574] New: editorial - add note that UA need not send Origin header (Thursday, 29 March)
• [Bug 16572] New: Meta generator: Validator must say that alt conformance check was skipped (Thursday, 29 March)
• [Bug 16564] New: The directionality of a textarea should be determined based on its parent if its value does not have any strong characters (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16551] New: Is there any reason for defaultUrl to be non-null in any but the first keymessage event? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16548] New: Require generateKeyRequest() in all cases for all Key Systems (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16553] New: Consider not firing a needkey event when a potentially encrypted stream is encountered if the key is already known (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16550] New: Should sessionId checks in addKey() and cancelKeyRequest() be synchronous? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16552] New: Consider making needkey a simple event (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16549] New: Remove initData parameter from addKey() (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16547] New: Is there a use case for explicitly releasing keys? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Bug 16544] New: Clarify frame handling for frame based encryption (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16543] New: Clarify that the spec adds explicit support for content protection (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16542] New: Clarify abstract about "No 'DRM' is added" (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16541] New: Update examples to use async XHR (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16540] New: Provide guidelines on Key System string format (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16538] New: aria mapping for details and summary are problematic (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Bug 16530] New: HR aka horizontal rule no longer visual (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16524] New: Hi Ian, I've some comments about the recent added line dashes. Right now, the mozilla and webkit implements this as an attribute, but in this version, it uses setLineDash() and getLineDash(). These setter/getter are not consistent with the other line styl (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16520] New: Don't indicate that XML MIME types *requires* xml:lang (Monday, 26 March)
• [Bug 16515] New: Fix the wording on the @value attribute (Sunday, 25 March)
• [Bug 16514] New: Replace "The" with "An" (improved wording) (Sunday, 25 March)
• [Bug 16505] New: I would like more clarification on the concept of the term "groups" in regards to the section on definition lists found at: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/grouping-content.html#the-dl-element Quite a bit of time is spent defining these groups, for example: "I (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16504] New: Improve white-space note. E.g. add that not just JS but CSS too is affected (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16503] New: [AAPI]: (Saturday, 24 March)
• [Bug 16497] New: HTML should provide a tag called <index> so that the authors of the web pages can enclose words and phrases that they think should be indexed. This would help search engines and others who would like to index web pages. Even the web authors could use a (Friday, 23 March)
• [Bug 16482] New: missing text for stroke() (Thursday, 22 March)
• [Bug 16472] New: Consider DOMString? for HTMLInputElement:value IDL attribute (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16466] New: for ellipse: "radius radians" should be "rotation radians" (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Bug 16442] New: This page nearly crashes my browser (firefox 10.0.2) as it attempts to load the whole long length of the page. This seems to be a major disadvantage, making it hard to read the spec when just loading it has the potential to crash or extremely slow the br (Tuesday, 20 March)
• [Bug 16364] New: Paragraph: Within 'The "in body" insertion mode' the paragraph 'A start tag whose tag name is "xmp"'. This paragraph causes browser to always handle an xmp tag with a p tag as ending the p tag involved. In default xmp is a block element and this is no pr (Wednesday, 14 March)
• [Bug 16394] New: Form-associated elements with non-ancestor form owners should be reset when owner is removed from the tree (Thursday, 15 March)
• [Bug 16400] New: 'radio button group' rule issue (Friday, 16 March)
• [Bug 16401] New: potential typo in browsing context note (Friday, 16 March)
• [Bug 16399] New: 'reset the form owner' algorithm issue (Friday, 16 March)
• [Bug 16393] New: The last paragraph of "Caret and selection management" use a phrase to define itself: "The caret position is the rectangular left edge of the caret position within an element having focus." So a caret position is the left edge of a caret position is the l (Thursday, 15 March)
• [Bug 16343] New: How about adding an attribute for type=file inputs that would specify the maximum allowed file size ? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• [Bug 16331] New: Update non-finite float handling to WebIDL (Monday, 12 March)
• [Bug 16315] New: Hello, You've got something strange happening with the code example here http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#use-div-for-wrappers Cheers, Murray. (Sunday, 11 March)
• [Bug 16269] New: I think there needs to be a way to, when a document has multiple style elements which have different titles, specify which of the stylesheets are alternate stylesheets and which one is the default stylesheet. (Thursday, 8 March)
• [Bug 16239] New: Add a section on Obsolete APIs (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16237] New: Rename Absent to Obsolete (Tuesday, 6 March)
• [Bug 16231] New: Why do I have to end the script tag when loading a script from an external resource? I have to do: <script src="foo.js"></script> I think it should be enough to do: <script src="foo.js" /> (Monday, 5 March)
• [Bug 16222] New: editorial: "surrounds ... by'' (Saturday, 3 March)
• [Bug 16221] New: editorial: "as such" doesn't fit (Saturday, 3 March)
• [Bug 16212] New: I would say that it would also be really nice to implement Google ads or a plugin that converts your .mp4 video to whichever the current browser Supports. (Saturday, 3 March)
• [Bug 16204] New: editorial - sec. 1.2 needs a few commas (Friday, 2 March)
• [Bug 16190] New: Polyglot Markup: Clarify that xml:lang is optional (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16186] New: HTML 5 missing explicit directives for support full keyboard access (FKA) when navigating to a fragment identifier (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Bug 16169] New: Define the CSSElementMap (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16167] New: i18n-ISSUE-141: Mistake in entity assignments (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16166] New: i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16165] New: i18n-ISSUE-136: Recognition of number formats in Number state (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16164] New: Section 11 is blank (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16160] New: dir=auto does not work for user-visible attribute values (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [Bug 16155] New: Specify behavior for embedded content elements that have no browsing context (Tuesday, 28 February)

Cameron Jones

• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 20 March)

Cameron McCormack

• comments from SVG WG forthcoming on recent canvas/path additions (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Introductiones (Saturday, 10 March)

Carr, Wayne

• RE: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Friday, 9 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Monday, 12 March)
• 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)

Charles Pritchard

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Enabling DRM Task Force Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: video.getContext (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Monday, 5 March)
• Signaling and out of band content, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)

Christian Kaiser

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)

Clarke Stevens

• Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)

Daniel Schattenkirchner

• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Tuesday, 13 March)

Dave Singer

• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)

David Carlisle

• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Monday, 12 March)

David Dorwin

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)

David Singer

• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)

Doug Schepers

• Call for Review: Web Audio API (Monday, 19 March)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Change Proposal for ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix (Thursday, 1 March)

Frank Olivier

• RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Revert request r7023 (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)

Gerald Oskoboiny

• Re: Introductiones (Saturday, 10 March)

Glenn Adams

• Re: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22 (Thursday, 22 March)
• {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Chair Review of the Change Proposals for issue 179 (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)

Ian Devlin

• Re: Chair review of the issue-185 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: ISSUE-199: aria-processing - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Friday, 2 March)

Jace Voracek

• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Saturday, 10 March)

Jacob Rossi

• RE: Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal (Thursday, 29 March)
• Spec changes for ISSUE-180 change proposal (was {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics) (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, other topics (Friday, 16 March)

Janina Sajka

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: FW: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)

janina@rednote.net

• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 15 March)
• Verbosity of microdata (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Tuesday, 13 March)

John C. Vernaleo

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Sunday, 4 March)

John Foliot

• RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Saturday, 24 March)
• Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Saturday, 24 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: hypothetical question on longdesc (Sunday, 18 March)
• RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Wednesday, 14 March)
• RE: Revert request (Wednesday, 14 March)
• RE: Revert request (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Counter Proposal Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (Saturday, 3 March)
• Change proposal for Issue 203 (Thursday, 1 March)

John Simmons

• RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (Sunday, 4 March)
• RE: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-195: form-http-req - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Fwd: Re: Working Group Last Call: httpbis p4 / p5 / p6 / p7 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Fwd: [apps-discuss] WGLC: draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-03.txt (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: reference in HTML5 differences document. (Thursday, 1 March)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Monday, 26 March)

Kevin Streeter

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)

Kornel Lesiński

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: video.getContext (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypting content stored on untrusted CDNs (Saturday, 3 March)

L. David Baron

• Re: implementation of HTML5 context menu (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)

Laura Carlson

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Revert request (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Revert request (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Revert request (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Revert request (Tuesday, 6 March)

Leif H Silli

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Sorry for meaningles subject. Was: <off-public.html>: etc (Sunday, 18 March)
• <off-public.html>: hypothetical question on longdesc (Sunday, 18 March)
• [public-html] <none> (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Revert request (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: 'what is the web' Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)

Leonard Rosenthol

• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)

Léonie Watson

• RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Friday, 23 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: ISSUE-183: enhance-time - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Chair Feedback on Change Proposal for ISSUE-183 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: reference in HTML5 differences document. (Thursday, 1 March)

Manu Sporny

• New Heartbeat WD for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 11 March)

Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com

• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)

Mark Watson

• Re: ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: AES-CTR inside vs. outside the media container (was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Signaling and out of band content, was: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• CDM availability (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Widevine, "necessary requirements", "silent monitoring" etc. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)

Matthew Turvey

• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Saturday, 10 March)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Revert request (Thursday, 8 March)

Paul Cotton

• ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Straw Poll for Objections (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Revert request r7023 (Monday, 26 March)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-197 accept-file-ext by Amicable Resolution (Thursday, 22 March)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-196 ua-http-resp-handling by Amicable Resolution (Thursday, 22 March)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-193 inaccessible-example by Amicable Resolution (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: Review of second reopen request for issue 31b [alt-location] (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179) (Thursday, 8 March)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution (Thursday, 8 March)
• ACTION-209: Set up an encrypted media proposal task force (Thursday, 8 March)
• {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-08: issue progress, heartbeat drafts, F2F meeting plans, task force reports (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Working Group Decision on ISSUE-183 sub-issue: time syntax (Wednesday, 7 March)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution (Wednesday, 7 March)
• ISSUE-198: innerHTML-patent-policy - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 6 March)
• CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps (Sunday, 4 March)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Friday, 2 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• ay face-to-face registration (RE: CfC on May face-to-face meeting for HTML WG) (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: W3C FAQ on DRM and HTML5 ?! (Sunday, 4 March)
• May face-to-face meetings for HTML and WebApps (Thursday, 1 March)

Robert Hansen

• Element Failure Mode (Tuesday, 20 March)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: video.getContext (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: video.getContext (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)

Sam Ruby

• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-197 accept-file-ext by Amicable Resolution (Friday, 30 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-196 ua-http-resp-handling by Amicable Resolution (Friday, 30 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-193 inaccessible-example by Amicable Resolution (Friday, 30 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-80 title-alternative by Amicable Resolution (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2 (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1 (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Chair pre-review of the issue-204 change proposals (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Chair review of the issue-185 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Chair review of the issue-184 change proposals (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-190 coding-example by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Heading towards a feature freeze (was: {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-03-22) (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• CfC: Close ISSUE-80 title-alternative by Amicable Resolution (Wednesday, 21 March)
• ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-192 title-attribute by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-188: generic-track-format by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-182 footnote-recommendation by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-179 av_param by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Working Group Decision: Close ISSUE-170 rel-uri-valid by Amicable Resolution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Change proposal for Issue 203 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: proposal for ISSUE-191: replace ins and del elements by an attibute-based solution (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 1 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: ISSUE-134 change proposals review - Part 2 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: hypothetical question on longdesc (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: CfC: Publish ten heartbeat drafts as WDs (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Revert request (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Change proposal for Issue 203 (Friday, 2 March)

Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

• AW: Element Failure Mode (Tuesday, 20 March)

Sean Hayes

• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: video.getContext (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: video.getContext (Friday, 9 March)
• video.getContext (Friday, 9 March)

Sharon Newman (COHEN)

• RE: Option element in a Datalist with no label (Thursday, 15 March)
• Option element in a Datalist with no label (Thursday, 15 March)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Text description for @poster (was RE: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]) (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Revert request r7023 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Revert request (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: reference in HTML5 differences document. (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: reference in HTML5 differences document. (Thursday, 1 March)

Smylers

• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Monday, 5 March)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: ISSUE-201: canvas-fallback - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Friday, 30 March)
• ARIA roles for hit regions (Tuesday, 27 March)
• hit testing proposal added to Hixie's HTML (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc] (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: ISSUE-194: full-transcript - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Reminder of the Deadline for reopen requests based on New Information (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Chairs Solicit Proposals (was: Chair review of "Keep Longdesc Deprecated") (Tuesday, 13 March)
• implementation of details/summary appears suboptimal (Monday, 12 March)
• implementation of HTML5 context menu (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Note in HTML4 spec about html5? (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: ISSUE-164: remove or modify hgroup (Wednesday, 7 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Revert request r7023 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Introductiones (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: <style scoped> and the cascade (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: CDM availability (was Re: Encrypted Media proposal) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (Thursday, 1 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2012 14:20:19 UTC