- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:11:14 +0200
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Christian Kaiser <kaiserc@google.com>, "<public-html@w3.org>" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > This is exactly why encryption should be defined by container formats, not CDMs, so that CDMs *are* interchangeable. This is how we at Netflix are able to work with multiple CDMs but one set of media files using the ISO Common Encryption standard for mp4 files. It's a principle we could require in association with this proposal. This seem like an important constraint on CDM design. Why isn't this stated in the proposal? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 08:11:47 UTC