Re: Revert request r7023

On 03/16/2012 05:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net>  wrote:
>> On 03/16/2012 05:22 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:46:40 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr.
>>> <jackalmage@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At the request of the chairs, I'd like to reiterate my opposal to
>>>> reverting this. Same reasons as before.
>>>
>>> To make it more explicit, I also object to reverting this per prior
>>> given arguments.
>>
>> I encourage all those who might oppose this revert request to respond to the
>> existing call for proposals on ISSUE-201:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0267.html
>
> I am not ready to respond to that issue.  I'd wait until Hixie is done
> with his edits, as I agree with what he's doing on this front (I
> helped somewhat in designing them).

If this feature is not ready for HTML5, there always is HTML.next.

> ~TJ

- Sam Ruby

Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 21:56:17 UTC