- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:16:55 -0700
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
The HTML editor recently made a wide reaching, unilateral change to the Canvas 2D specification from its Last Call presentation. Note the large change in IDL between these two Working Drafts. http://www.w3.org/TR/2dcontext/ http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/Overview.html http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7022&to=7023 While I appreciate his attention to the Canvas 2D spec, I would hope that his changes would reflect existing vendor implementations and/or group consensus about late alterations to the Canvas 2D specification. I'm concerned that the change will create undo burden on implementers and authors. A much simpler change set was proposed last year and has not been addressed by the editor. It's my contention that the editor's "Path" object, as it is authored, is not appropriate for Canvas 2D but may be appropriate for SVG2. An alternative "CanvasPath" object, much simpler and effective, was proposed last year. The editor did not originate this API, and should be taking greater care to follow its structure as part of its independent maintenence. Instead, it seems to be suffering from a lot of instability, instability which is harming implementation of needed features as commented on by responders of the Last Call poll. I'd like to see this specification working for LC, not burdened with guesstimates as to what implementers are willing to endure on their journey across time with the one true HTML Editor. -Charles
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 01:17:23 UTC