W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Chair review of the issue-189 change proposals

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:14:33 -0400
Message-ID: <4F721FA9.90206@intertwingly.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/27/2012 12:42 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Review of the following proposal:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0272.html
>> "the spec takes the position that registration of scheme name prefixes
>> is possible"
>> Drop this. The current spec text presumes that describing a
>> convention is possible. It does not presume that IETF registration
>> of such a convention is possible. In fact, everyone seems to agree
>> that IETF does not provide such a mechanism.
> "web+ scheme prefix" is in the IANA registration section, so yes, it
> *does* take that position.

We have an alternate change proposal that attempts to address this.  Is 
the alternate proposal one that you can live with, or does it have any 
correctable problems which, if addressed, would result in something you 
could support?

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 20:15:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:50 UTC