Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of the discussion so far

On 3/12/2012 3:56 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> But I would note that this is not what you appeared to ask, but 
> correct me if I'm wrong. It looked to me like you were stating an 
> expectation about all implementations of CDMs, as opposed to just the 
> framework/architecture expressed by the proposal. If you only intended 
> the latter, then I agree that is a fair question, and one that will be 
> dealt with by the standard call for exclusion process and WG 
> membership process.
>
> I don't see any thing out of the ordinary here that would require 
> departing from SOP. Do you?
>

I don't see a reason to depart from process.

Given that this is an API proposal, I recommend moving the thread over 
to public-webapps for future discussion.
Unless there's an objection to that, I'll post new threads over there.

-Charles

Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 23:27:10 UTC