On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > There is currently a de facto requirement that CDMs be closed-source > and/or royalty-encumbered. > *some* CDMs... some != all > We don't need the content-protection vendors to offer a solution. We > need the video distributors to agree that ClearKey or something > similar is sufficient for them to be happy delivering video over > <video>, or even better, to agree that no special mechanism is > required. > how many times must it be pointed out that video distributors don't make this decision; you seem to be mistaking video distributors as the MPAA/RIAA; you need to make your case to the latter, not the formerReceived on Monday, 5 March 2012 20:20:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:49 UTC