W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Revert request

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:20:20 +0900
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120308042019.GR12541@sideshowbarker>
Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, 2012-03-06 15:46 -0600:

> Mike, I assume one recourse to all of this is to file an appeal to
> have Last Call rescinded as it was entered into under a false promise
> [1]. Is this correct?

The mechanism the W3C process provides for an appeal is to raise a Formal
Objection. You can raise a formal objection about any WG decision, and the
WG is responsible for recording that FO and including it as part of any
transition request to advance the spec the next maturity level for which
Director approval is required. Director approval is (was) not required for
the group to publish a Last Call WD. The next transition step that does
require Director approval is advancing the spec to CR.

So if you were to raise an FO, I think you would need to raise it
(retroactively) against the May 24 WG Decision to proceed to Last Call:


The chairs would then be responsible for recording it along with the
other LC formal objections here:


Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 04:20:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:21 UTC