The rebuttal sectoin was updated with one additional list item at the bottom of this subsection: <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/FlowContentInObject#Rebutting_block_element_nesting_problems_claims> As well as with two list items at the bottom of this subsection: <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/FlowContentInObject#Rebuttal_of_interactivity_change_claims> Leif H Silli Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:38:55 +0200: > Hello, I have now added a rebuttal section, > > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/FlowContentInObject#Rebuttal_of_the_Counter_Change_Proposal_-_CCP> > > and thus considers the CP ready for poll (unless Ted updates his CCP > with something that needs refutation). > > Leif H Silli > > Sam Ruby, Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:31:54 -0400: >> On 03/26/2012 06:20 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >>> One thing: Ted claims, in his CCP, that I don't present use cases. If >>> time allows, I might expand on that point - perhaps on a separate page >>> with and with a link from the CP - until the poll is ready to run. >>> Changes/additions will be listed in the changes section in the bottom >>> of the CP. >> >> So in other words, upon further reflection, you are not done updating >> your proposal. >> >> We still plan to proceed next week. Possibly sooner if you do >> finish updating your proposal. >> >>> Leif H Silli >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 14:51:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:22 UTC