Re: Preparing for an ISSUE-158 straw poll

The rebuttal sectoin was updated with one additional list item at the 
bottom of this subsection:
<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/FlowContentInObject#Rebutting_block_element_nesting_problems_claims>

As well as with two list items at the bottom of this subsection:
<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/FlowContentInObject#Rebuttal_of_interactivity_change_claims>

Leif H Silli

Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:38:55 +0200:
> Hello, I have now added a rebuttal section,
> 
> 
<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/FlowContentInObject#Rebuttal_of_the_Counter_Change_Proposal_-_CCP>
> 
> and thus considers the CP ready for poll (unless Ted updates his CCP 
> with something that needs refutation).
> 
> Leif H Silli
> 
> Sam Ruby, Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:31:54 -0400:
>> On 03/26/2012 06:20 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>>> One thing: Ted claims, in his CCP, that I don't present use cases. If
>>> time allows, I might expand on that point - perhaps on a separate page
>>> with and with a link from the CP - until the poll is ready to run.
>>> Changes/additions will be listed in the changes section in the bottom
>>> of the CP.
>> 
>> So in other words, upon further reflection, you are not done updating 
>> your proposal.
>> 
>> We still plan to proceed next week.   Possibly sooner if you do 
>> finish updating your proposal.
>> 
>>> Leif H Silli
>> 
>> - Sam Ruby
>> 
>