- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:44:16 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Hi all, I second this request. Best Regards, Laura On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi there, > > I believe that the addition of the "http+aes" URI scheme > (<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5601;r2=1.5602> > plus subsequent edits) is controversial in that: > > - there's a related issue (ISSUE-179) which hasn't been decided yet, > > and > > - addition of a new URI scheme seems to be a major change that shouldn't > happen after Last Call without broad consensus. > > See also related thread starting with > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0795.html>. > > Best regards, Julian > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 12:44:48 UTC