On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > I can't speak for Silverlight, but Flash at least is much better > understood. It's not open-source, but it's been natively > reimplemented by at least Chrome. It also has a bunch of utility for > authors and users outside just being a DRM box. I don't think a port based on direct access to the original source counts as "natively reimplemented". It is certainly not an independent implementation. It is also closed source and restrictively licensed. I do not think you can cite Chrome's bundling of Flash as a poster child for RF technologies. Regards, MaciejReceived on Friday, 9 March 2012 20:52:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:50 UTC