- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:06:51 +0000
- To: Jace Voracek <jacevoracek@me.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 12/03/2012 15:54, Jace Voracek wrote: > Good eye with finding XHTML 1.0 as the "latest version of HTML". > The XHTML 1.0 specification was the original recommendation of HTML hardly:-) HTML pre-dates XML (and so XHTML) by years. > so the > URL http://www.w3.org/TR/html remains as such. No. It was a later redirect added presumably at the time xhtml 1 was published, but it seems utterly wrong/confusing. > I understand, as you > mentioned, how that can be confusing for one searching for the latest > HTML recommendation. Forwarding http://www.w3.org/TR/html to > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5 would make the original XHTML 1.0 > specification unaccessible, No it would still be available at the rather more natural http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ which is the one listed at in the front matter of the document. > but perhaps providing a URL to the XHTML namespace would suffice. The > namespace points to the major specifications relevant to HTML > including the HTML5 working draft, so a browser would be able to find > the latest version of HTML from there. Given that namespaces are an xml feature, I don't think anyone should be expected to look at a namespace url to find out anything about html which is not, for the most part, an xml language. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 16:07:22 UTC