W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

RE: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals

From: John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:35:25 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Christian Kaiser <kaiserc@google.com>, "<public-html@w3.org>" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FF4EB51321FAE847A9650D1E9ABB57A4408EAE9D@TK5EX14MBXC301.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
I assumed your statement that Charles's proposal doesn't address "virtually any" of the problems raised you were referring to technical issues. I have followed this discussion closely, and IMO most of comments from the people you list have been more ideological than technical.

It would be useful to understand the strictly engineering issues you see with the encrypted media proposal.

John C. Simmons | Media Platform Architect | Microsoft Corporation | direct 425-707-2911  | mobile 425-269-5759

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 2:17 PM
> To: John Simmons
> Cc: Charles Pritchard; Mark Watson; Henri Sivonen; Christian Kaiser;
> <public-html@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Encrypted Media proposal: Summary of counter-proposals
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:56 PM, John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > Could you be explicit?
> Not at the moment, no.  I and several other browser vendors have been
> very explicit repeatedly throughout the threads on this subject.  I
> suggest reviewing the messages posted so far, particularly those from
> me, Henri Sivonen, Boris Zbarsky, Ian Hickson, or Lachlan Hunt.
> ~TJ

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 22:36:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:50 UTC