On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:50:11 -0000, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > I believe that the addition of the "http+aes" URI scheme > (<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5601;r2=1.5602> > plus subsequent edits) is controversial in that: > > - there's a related issue (ISSUE-179) which hasn't been decided yet, I fail to see connection with av_param issue (unless you're referring to Encrypted Media proposal that followed it). However, even though I've proposed the scheme myself, I won't object to the removal, as there were some good comments made on ietf-http-wg mailing list regarding this scheme. I think it may be redesigned to use "enc:<keyinfo>:http://.." syntax[1] or rely on an intermediate file with key and checksums[2]. -- regards, Kornel Lesiński [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0833.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0830.htmlReceived on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 13:07:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:21 UTC