On 02.03.2012 19:42, Glenn Adams wrote: > Of course, at the black box level for the purpose of defining the > API behavior of the CDM, it is necessary to define semantics. > However, a single instance of a no-op CDM (that translates plaintext > to plaintext) would be sufficient to verify that behavior and test the > API. I do not see any reason why an API for a no op might be required. Maybe it is time to reject the proposal without spending more time on it. Cheers, AndreasReceived on Friday, 2 March 2012 20:54:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:49 UTC