Hi there, I believe that the addition of the "http+aes" URI scheme (<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5601;r2=1.5602> plus subsequent edits) is controversial in that: - there's a related issue (ISSUE-179) which hasn't been decided yet, and - addition of a new URI scheme seems to be a major change that shouldn't happen after Last Call without broad consensus. See also related thread starting with <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0795.html>. Best regards, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 10:50:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:49 UTC