- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:16:03 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:16:34 UTC
On 22.3.2012 12:17, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Right. Though asserting that its-locNote is valid would be a terrible > idea, since the parsing algorithm cannot output such an attribute in > the document tree. It makes more sense to assert that its-loc-note is > valid. Yes, sure attribute names will be lowercased. Henri are you willing to add support for such additional HTML5+XXX vocabularies into validator.nu given that you are provided with RELAX NG schema implementing additional xxx- prefixed attributes? Thanks, Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:16:34 UTC