W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]

From: <janina@rednote.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:25:02 -0400
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, ""'xn--mlform-iua@målform.no'"" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "rubys@intertwingly.net" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "mjs@apple.com" <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120323162502.GE5347@sonata.rednote.net>

I'm sorry. I didn't mean you individually. That was unquestionably
sloppy of me and I humbly apologize.

I'm referring to the things I noted, ID3 tagging, DVD Chapters, ...
Those, I contend, are sloppy. They don't help properly tag a symphony or
a theatrical play.

So, now that I've apologized, can I get you to respond substantively?

David Singer writes:
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 8:54 , janina@rednote.net wrote:
> >  It's simply sloppy thinking to confuse
> > the two, imho, and I'm frankly fed up with it. There's far too much of
> > this kind of sloppiness in digital media that we now have to undo.
> OK.  I am done.  You stay with your sloppy thinking, and I'll stay with mine.
> Thanks for the flexible and courteous conversation.  Good day.
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.


Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200

Chair, Open Accessibility	janina@a11y.org	
Linux Foundation		http://a11y.org

Chair, Protocols & Formats
Web Accessibility Initiative	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 16:25:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:22 UTC