Re: Revert request r7023

On 03/16/2012 05:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 05:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sam Ruby<> wrote:
>>> On 03/16/2012 05:22 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:46:40 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr.
>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>> At the request of the chairs, I'd like to reiterate my opposal to
>>>>> reverting this. Same reasons as before.
>>>> To make it more explicit, I also object to reverting this per prior
>>>> given arguments.
>>> I encourage all those who might oppose this revert request to respond
>>> to the
>>> existing call for proposals on ISSUE-201:
>> I am not ready to respond to that issue. I'd wait until Hixie is done
>> with his edits, as I agree with what he's doing on this front (I
>> helped somewhat in designing them).
> If this feature is not ready for HTML5, there always is

After conferring with my co-chairs, if no Change Proposal is produced in 
response to issue 201, we will proceed to a Call for Consensus on the 
Change Proposal that we do have.  As a part of that Call for Consensus. 
  Should that Call for Consensus pass, we will request that r7023 be 

>> ~TJ
> - Sam Ruby

- Sam Ruby

Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 02:41:10 UTC