- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:35:09 -0500
- To: "Ms2ger @ Mozilla" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- CC: ext Tony Ross <tross@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 2/28/12 2:40 PM, ext Tony Ross wrote: >> From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 3:16 PM >> >> On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >>> During WebApps' 31-Oct-2010 TPAC meeting, the group agreed [1] DOM >>> Parsing and Serialization [2] was in scope and Chaals added it as an explicit >>> deliverable in the Draft charter that will soon be submitted to the AC for >>> approval. >>> >>> During that meeting Ms2ger expressed some interest in editing it in W3C >>> space. Ms2ger - would you please clarify your intent with this spec vis-à-vis >>> the W3C? >>> >>> Additionally, Doug agreed to "ask the SVG WG for editors". Doug - what is >>> the status of this action? >>> >>> Anyhow, I don't have a strong opinion of which WG should take the lead >>> here and if someone does, please speak up. >> Great, if the draft becomes a Web Apps deliverable, that should greatly >> simplify this situation. I don't personally think it needs to be an HTML WG >> draft, and I suspect the Change Proposal author would accept a Web Apps >> draft as well, even though the Change Proposal specifies HTML WG. > I'd prefer to publish this in the HTML WG since that's where these APIs originated, but I'm open to discussion. > > If needed, Microsoft can provide an editor. Ms2ger - what is your intent with this spec vis-à-vis the W3C and what is your preference re WG? -Thanks, Art > > -Tony >
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 19:35:21 UTC