- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:27:14 +1100
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: html-a11y@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Hi Laura, On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Silvia, > > If <video poster> provided no content, <video poster> would not exist. The opposite is true: if <video shortTextAlternative> provides information, then video's initial display should also provide information to the sighted user. However, most of the time the displayed frame is useless. So therefore, in order to give both, sighted and non-sighted users the same information on a video, we need to introduce the ability to provide a meaningful placeholder frame for the video. It's actually comical that for video with a short text alternative the blind user has an advantage over the sighted user! That is: once we have agreed on what name we want to give to that attribute that holds the short text alternative for video. I continue to believe that aria-label provides for all that we require. > I hope that everyone in the HTML Working Group comprehends the big > picture here. Increasingly HTML5 is relying on ARIA to provide for > HTML5's accessibility failings. I regard the "name-spacing" of the "aria-" attribute set as a helpful means to learn what attributes are useful to implement accessibility for HTML. I don't actually think we should expect the HTML WG to come up with more native attributes to solve accessibility issues - it's so much easier to understand if they are all handled by the same body. Regards, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 00:28:02 UTC