On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:50:02 +0100, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com> wrote: > In the "Risks" section of the proposal i have documented and addressed > the anticipated security concern. That is not very clear. Also, that should be part of the details section if so. > While CORS is referenced in HTML it is not a pre-requesite for > implementations. It is. > HTTP is the deployment i am referring to and it is interaction with > this protocol which the proposal recommends. You have raised concern > that further information is required for specification however i am > stating that further information is not required - or available - as > it is already under specification, implementation and deployment on a > global scale and with universal adoption. This is nonsense given the context of what is available to web pages today. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:02:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:22 UTC