On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > On 3/12/2012 3:56 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > >> But I would note that this is not what you appeared to ask, but correct >> me if I'm wrong. It looked to me like you were stating an expectation about >> all implementations of CDMs, as opposed to just the framework/architecture >> expressed by the proposal. If you only intended the latter, then I agree >> that is a fair question, and one that will be dealt with by the standard >> call for exclusion process and WG membership process. >> >> I don't see any thing out of the ordinary here that would require >> departing from SOP. Do you? >> >> > I don't see a reason to depart from process. > > Given that this is an API proposal, I recommend moving the thread over to > public-webapps for future discussion. > Unless there's an objection to that, I'll post new threads over there. i would suggest you wait for the outcome of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Mar/0275.html it would probably be a bad idea to move this thread to webapps until the proposed HTML5 Media TF is inauguratedReceived on Monday, 12 March 2012 23:48:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:21 UTC