On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Once again, if a video distributor requires a CDM that does this (and > you continue to suggest this is a possibility), then it's a de facto > part of the proposal. The fact that this is a possibility is a strike > against the proposal. Tab, with all respect, my opinion is that if something is not in a W3C spec then it is out of scope (for this proposal and this discussion). Your opinion appears to be that anything that can or will go into a user agent is in scope. I see no way to bridge that difference, so I will not attempt to further justify mine or Cox's position on this subject. Cheers, GlennReceived on Thursday, 8 March 2012 22:28:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:50 UTC