Re: Revert request r7023

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 05:22 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:46:40 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr.
>> <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> At the request of the chairs, I'd like to reiterate my opposal to
>>> reverting this. Same reasons as before.
>>
>> To make it more explicit, I also object to reverting this per prior
>> given arguments.
>
> I encourage all those who might oppose this revert request to respond to the
> existing call for proposals on ISSUE-201:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0267.html

I am not ready to respond to that issue.  I'd wait until Hixie is done
with his edits, as I agree with what he's doing on this front (I
helped somewhat in designing them).

~TJ

Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 21:44:24 UTC