- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:34:16 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Additional rationale for reverting this change: - there is an alternative proposal before the group [1] which has been the subject of considerable debate, not yet concluded - the http+aes propose is immature, has had little review by this group and no review by security experts outside this group I suggest the proposal be considered by the new media encryption Task Force along with [1]. ...Mark [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Hi there, > > I believe that the addition of the "http+aes" URI scheme (<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5601;r2=1.5602> plus subsequent edits) is controversial in that: > > - there's a related issue (ISSUE-179) which hasn't been decided yet, > > and > > - addition of a new URI scheme seems to be a major change that shouldn't happen after Last Call without broad consensus. > > See also related thread starting with <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0795.html>. > > Best regards, Julian > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 17:35:16 UTC