w3c-wai-ua@w3.org from January to March 2001 by author

Aaron Leventhal

• Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Real world example of destructive onfocus (Saturday, 10 March)
• Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Navigation without side-effects (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Making all interactive elements visible (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Single keystroke commands (Tuesday, 6 March)
• What's the real-life meaning of an element? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Another issue for DOM WG meeting (Thursday, 1 March)

Al Gilman

• control over focus styling in IE (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: [Editorial] Re-align speech checkpoint with CSS2 terminology (Sunday, 18 March)
• [editorial] conformance vs. device independence (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Responses to Al Gilman issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text should not be minimal requirement (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key" (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 11 March)
• Focus ambiguity problem (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: Navigation without side-effects (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: What's the real-life meaning of an element? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: problems with Checkpoint 2.1 (Thursday, 1 February)
• problems with Checkpoint 2.1 (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Client-side redirection is timed input (Friday, 26 January)
• Congratulations, David (Friday, 26 January)
• Fwd: FW: UAAG 1.0 last call comments (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Raw minutes from 22 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: motionless? (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: motionless? (Thursday, 4 January)

Bryan Campbell

• Re: Responses to Bryan Campbell issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Sunday, 18 March)

by way of Harvey Bingham

• Re: Software tools for captioning (Thursday, 8 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• last call non-vote (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Extending my action item... (Wednesday, 21 March)
• regrets (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: March 9 Draft of UAAG (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about textformats from Note to checkpoint (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2 (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Sunday, 11 March)
• RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10 (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: [Action] Two proposed Guideline splits (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Navigation without side-effects (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: User Agent Update (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Animation (Tuesday, 6 March)
• SMIL positioning (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Agenda items for face-to-face meeting (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior. (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Sunday, 18 February)
• RE: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: problems with Checkpoint 2.1 (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001 (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001 (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Question regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: (Action): Proposals and questions about "presentations" and "animations" [Issue 430] (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: per my action item on mouse binding configuration (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: Raw minutes from 22 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference (Wednesday, 24 January)
• using javscript to simulate mouse events (Saturday, 13 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4 (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note) (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Issue 375: Resolved by issue 323? (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: motionless? (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Raw minutes from 4 January 2001 UAWG teleconference (Friday, 5 January)

Chris Lilley

• sections of SVG spec I was talking about (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 27 February)

Cohen, Aaron M

• RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 24 February)

Constantine Stephanidis

• Call for Papers: New international journal UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY (Tuesday, 30 January)

Daniel Dardailler

• Re: Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG (Tuesday, 13 February)

David Poehlman

• Re: Rough comparison of UAAG 1.0 and section 508 requirements for software applications (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Decision to return to last call [Was: Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference\ (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Editorial Comments (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"? (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: TECHNIQUES: Checkpoint 9.2, 9.3, 9.5 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: [Editorial] Two glossary comments (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: input api naming conventions: (Thursday, 22 March)
• input api naming conventions: (Thursday, 22 March)
• on search termination: (Tuesday, 20 March)
• info:Fw: A Significant Winamp Upgrade now Available (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2 (Thursday, 15 March)
• acrobat 5 accessible document creation guide (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Issue and techniques for Checkpoint 9.3 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Fw: Press Release: Reef Debuts EveryWare [nee Edapta] (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Saturday, 10 March)
• special announcement!Fw: CREN Webcast on Web accessibility, Thursday March 8 4pm US EST (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed changes to checkpoints related to focus, selection, and current viewport (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: [Action] Two proposed Guideline splits (Thursday, 8 March)
• Fw: Talking Web Browser Available (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: User Agent Executive Summary (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Saturday, 10 February)
• voice command browser. (Friday, 9 February)
• microsoft home page and exposing links (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: Instruction and Assessment (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Raw minutes of 25 Jan 2001 UA teleconference (Thursday, 25 January)
• configuring disabling of programatic objects (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Question regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 25 January)
• per my action item on mouse binding configuration (Monday, 22 January)
• appology (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note) (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: [Implementation report] Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: motionless? (Thursday, 4 January)
• motionless? (Thursday, 4 January)

Denis Anson

• RE: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE: March 9 Draft of UAAG (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: March 9 Draft of UAAG (Monday, 19 March)
• March 9 Draft of UAAG (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2 (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key" (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: Navigation without side-effects (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: Checkpoint 2.2 (timed input): Examples of "required user input"? (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI controls? (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specifiedbehavior. (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior. (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Sunday, 11 February)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content (Tuesday, 23 January)

DPawson@rnib.org.uk

• RE: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Monday, 12 February)

geoff freed

• Re: UA comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• UA comments (Tuesday, 20 March)

Greg Lowney

• RE: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Client-side redirection is timed input (Thursday, 25 January)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• RE: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"? (Friday, 30 March)

gregory j. rosmaita

• Minority Opinion: Priority of UAAG 12.1 (resent at chair's request) (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Thursday, 22 March)

Hansen, Eric

• RE: Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 29 March)
• Executive Summary as Part of UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are int erdependent (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RE: [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are int erdependent (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: [Conformance] Proposals regarding content/ui labels,input de vice conformance, and conformance example (Thursday, 22 March)
• FW: [Conformance] Proposals regarding content/ui labels, input de vice conformance, and conformance example (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: Responses to Eric Hansen issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• DRAFT Executive Summary (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI con trols? (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations (Saturday, 24 February)
• RE: Issue 435: Proposal to address non-normative nature of checkp oint groupings (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 3 21 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions) (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: User Agent Executive Summary (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: Meaning of "important special case" (Thursday, 25 January)
• RE: Meaning of "important special case" (Thursday, 25 January)
• Meaning of "important special case" (Thursday, 25 January)
• RE: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 25 January, 2001 (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Comments on 16 January 2001 Draft (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4 (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: motionless? (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: Issue 357: Proposed revision to applicability provision (Friday, 5 January)

Harvey Bingham

• Re: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"? (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 18 March)
• Editorial nits in UAAG10 (Sunday, 11 March)
• Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 11 March)
• FYI: Digital Talking Book Document Navigation Features List (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.13 (speech parameters): Seeking clarification on requirements (Monday, 26 February)
• References in UAAG and TECHS (Saturday, 24 February)
• Audio rate change -- function of user audiogram (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Proposal: Merge checkpoints about text foreground and background colors (4.3/4.4) (Wednesday, 3 January)

Ian Jacobs

• 31 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: Editorial Comments (Saturday, 31 March)
• Rough comparison of UAAG 1.0 and section 508 requirements for software applications (Friday, 30 March)
• Decision to return to last call [Was: Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference\ (Thursday, 29 March)
• Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 29 March)
• [Editorial] Clarification that 9.3, 9.5, 9.6 apply whatever the input modality conformance chosen (Thursday, 29 March)
• [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"? (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Executive Summary as Part of UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Scheduling (third) last call review for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Editorial] Two glossary comments (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are interdependent (Wednesday, 28 March)
• [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are interdependent (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: EDITORIAL: Checkpoint 9.5 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: EDITORIAL: Checkpoint 9.5 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• [Action] Draft summary appendix for UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• 23 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Thursday, 22 March)
• Raw minutes from 22 March 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: input api naming conventions: (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: input api naming conventions: (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001 (Thursday, 22 March)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001 (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text shouldnot be minimal requirement (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [Conformance] Proposals regarding content/ui labels, input device conformance, and conformance example (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: UA comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: UA comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: March 9 Draft of UAAG (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about textformats from Note to checkpoint (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: March 9 Draft of UAAG (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Responses to Bryan Campbell issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Action] Toggling placeholders (Sunday, 18 March)
• [Proposal] Activation of placeholders [Was: Raw minutes from 15 March 2001 UAWG teleconference] (Saturday, 17 March)
• [Action] Proposal to clarify checkpoint 2.9 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Issue 465: Proposal to address conformance through pointing device and voice input (Saturday, 17 March)
• [Editorial] Re-align speech checkpoint with CSS2 terminology (Saturday, 17 March)
• [Conformance] Issue 413: Need to do better job at clarifying what checkpoints apply to content/ui/both (Saturday, 17 March)
• Response to T.V. Raman issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Eric Hansen issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Karl Dubost issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Bryan Campbell issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to HTML WG issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Richard Premack issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Constantine Stephanidis issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to WCAG WG issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Dianna Callesen issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Responses to Al Gilman issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Responses to Earl Johnson issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Responses to Phill Jenkins issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Responses to Martin Duerst (I18N) issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Earl Johnson issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 17 March)
• Responses to Phill Jenkins issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Friday, 16 March)
• Responses to Martin Duerst (I18N) issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Friday, 16 March)
• Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Friday, 16 March)
• Raw minutes from 15 March 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 15 March)
• Checkpoint 9.1: Delete sentence about pointing device interaction (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text should not be minimal requirement (Thursday, 15 March)
• Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about text formats from Note to checkpoint (Thursday, 15 March)
• Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key" (Monday, 12 March)
• Responses to Al Gilman issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 12 March)
• [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key" (Monday, 12 March)
• [CLARIFICATION] Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10 (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs) (Sunday, 11 March)
• 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Friday, 9 March)
• Raw minutes from 8 March 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 8 March)
• Sample SMIL demos (Thursday, 8 March)
• Proposal for addressing animation questions [Was Re: Animation] (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Navigation without side-effects (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Proposed changes to checkpoints related to focus, selection, and current viewport (Thursday, 8 March)
• [Action] Two proposed Guideline splits (Thursday, 8 March)
• Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Thursday, 8 March)
• Proposed changes to checkpoints related to focus, selection, and current viewport (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Raw minutes from 2 March UAWG face-to-face available. (Friday, 2 March)
• Minutes from 1 March UAWG ftf (Friday, 2 March)
• Bridge now open for 1-2 March UA ftf meeting (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Summary of UA discussion with CSS WG (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: References in UAAG and TECHS (Sunday, 25 February)
• Agenda items for face-to-face meeting (Sunday, 25 February)
• 24 February 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Sunday, 25 February)
• Checkpoint 2.2 (timed input): Examples of "required user input"? (Saturday, 24 February)
• What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI controls? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Checkpoint 4.13 (speech parameters): Seeking clarification on requirements (Friday, 23 February)
• Issue 435: Proposal to address non-normative nature of checkpoint groupings (Friday, 23 February)
• Raw minutes from 22 Feb 2001 UA teleconference (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 22 February)
• [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specifiedbehavior. (Thursday, 22 February)
• [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Some topics for discussion with CSS WG (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Mouse Snap/Zap functionality (Thursday, 15 February)
• Raw minutes from 15 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Thursday, 15 February)
• Some topics for discussion with DOM WG (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)
• Raw minutes from 8 February 2001 UA teleconference. (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Guidelines 8 February 2001 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [Announcement] "Common User Agent Problems" published (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001 (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Client-side redirection is timed input (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Friday, 26 January)
• 26 Jan 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Client-side redirection is timed input (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Friday, 26 January)
• Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Instruction and Assessment (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Client-side redirection is timed input (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Meaning of "important special case" (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Meaning of "important special case" (Thursday, 25 January)
• Raw minutes of 25 Jan 2001 UA teleconference (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 25 January, 2001 (Wednesday, 24 January)
• (Action): Proposals and questions about "presentations" and "animations" [Issue 430] (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Question regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Raw minutes from 22 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference (Monday, 22 January)
• (Action) Issue 448: Proposed modification to Note after checkpoint 5.9 (DOM2 CSS) (Friday, 19 January)
• Raw minutes from 18 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• 16 Jan 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques availability (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Status summary for UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 15 January)
• (Action) Issue 327: Proposed checkpoint for character encoding support in APIs (Monday, 15 January)
• 13 January 2001 UAAG 1.0 and Techniques available (Saturday, 13 January)
• [Correction] Re: Raw minutes from 11 January 2001 UAWG teleconference (Friday, 12 January)
• Raw minutes from 11 January 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Proposal: Merge checkpoints about text foreground and background colors (4.3/4.4) (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 11 January 2001 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 11 January 2001 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Issue 429: Please reconsider resolution to add techniques about sharing user preferences (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Raw minutes from 9 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference (Tuesday, 9 January)
• [Implementation report] [Fwd: Question re: ECash client user interface configuration] (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Proposed definition: text decoration (Tuesday, 9 January)
• [Implementation report] Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Meeting page available for 1-2 March 2001 face-to-face (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 January 2001 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note) (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4 (Sunday, 7 January)
• (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Sunday, 7 January)
• (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5 (Saturday, 6 January)
• (Action) Issue 389: Request for clarification about conformance comments (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4 (Saturday, 6 January)
• (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Checkpoint 3.8: Unintentional omission of placeholders (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: UAAG 1.0: review comments from Adobe Systems (Saturday, 6 January)
• Issue 375: Resolved by issue 323? (Saturday, 6 January)
• (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note) (Saturday, 6 January)
• Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: motionless? (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: motionless? (Friday, 5 January)
• Issue 357: Proposed revision to applicability provision (Friday, 5 January)
• [Implementation report] Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420 (Friday, 5 January)
• Raw minutes from 4 January 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 4 January)
• Changes in 29 December 2000 version of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 4 January)

Jim Allan

• FW: media:Fw: Consumers combat pop-ups with software, Tricks (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: using javscript to simulate mouse events (Friday, 19 January)

Jon Gunderson

• Re: [Editorial] Clarification that 9.3, 9.5, 9.6 apply whatever the input modality conformance chosen (Friday, 30 March)
• Editorial Comments (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: TECHNIQUES: Checkpoint 9.2, 9.3, 9.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: control over focus styling in IE (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: [Editorial] Two glossary comments (Wednesday, 28 March)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 29 March 2001 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference for 29 March 2001 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• READ and COMMENT!!!! on March 23rd version of UAAG (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft (Tuesday, 27 March)
• TECHNIQUES: Checkpoint 9.2, 9.3, 9.5 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• EDITORIAL: Checkpoint 9.5 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001 (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: UA comments (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text should not be minimal requirement (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about text formats from Note to checkpoint (Monday, 19 March)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 March 2001 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 March 2001 (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Issue and techniques for Checkpoint 9.3 (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus (Tuesday, 13 March)
• TECHNIQUES and IMPLEMENTATION: Images of graphical controls for adjusting speech and dictionary entries for IBM ViaVoice Technology (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key" (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Navigation without side-effects (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Making all interactive elements visible (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: [Fwd: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review] (Friday, 9 March)
• Fwd: Re: User Agent Update (documentation information) (fwd) (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints (Thursday, 8 March)
• Change in Priority for new event checkpoints (Thursday, 8 March)
• AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 8 March 2001 (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: User Agent Update (documentation information) (Tuesday, 6 March)
• User Agent Update (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: WAI CG: Reminder, meeting today Tuesday 6 March, 2001 (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report (Monday, 5 March)
• Orientation to actions of the active element (Friday, 2 March)
• RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2 (timed input): Examples of "required user input"? (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI controls? (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.13 (speech parameters): Seeking clarification on requirements (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: Issue 435: Proposal to address non-normative nature of checkpoint groupings (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: Agenda items for face-to-face meeting (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations (Friday, 23 February)
• RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: MPEG 4 (Thursday, 22 February)
• REVIEW: Proposals for outstanding issues (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Marking image-maps (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior. (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior. (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Software accessibility demonstrations as the plenary (Thursday, 22 February)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 February 2001 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 February 2001 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Marking image-maps (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Boston FTF Meeting: Demonstration opportunities (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Action Item: Mouse activate JavaScript (Thursday, 15 February)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 February 2001 (Wednesday, 14 February)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 February 2001 (Wednesday, 14 February)
• User Agent Executive Summary (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Registration for UA FTF meeting (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)
• Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG (Friday, 9 February)
• Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)
• AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Guidelines 8 February 2001 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Web TV example of directional navigation (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: problems with Checkpoint 2.1 (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 Febraury 2001 (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001 (Wednesday, 31 January)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001 (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Tuesday, 30 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: Instruction and Assessment (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element" (Monday, 29 January)
• Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 (Wednesday, 24 January)
• AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 25 January, 2001 (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content (Monday, 22 January)
• Extra UA telecon today: 2:00 (EST), Phone: 617-252-7000 (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 448: Proposed modification to Note after checkpoint 5.9 (DOM2 CSS) (Friday, 19 January)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference (extra) 22 January (Friday, 19 January)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• AGENDA ADDITION: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: using javscript to simulate mouse events (Tuesday, 16 January)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Extra telecon (response requested) (Thursday, 11 January)
• AGENDA ADDITIONS: W3C User Agent Teleconference 11 January (Thursday, 11 January)
• ACTION ITEM: Things that can be recognized in scripting language for vieport control (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Issue 429: Please reconsider resolution to add techniques about sharing user preferences (Thursday, 11 January)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 11 January 2001 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 11 January 2001 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 January (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note) (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361 (Monday, 8 January)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 January 2001 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note) (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: motionless? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: motionless? (Friday, 5 January)
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Extra Telecon (Friday, 5 January)
• Draft of proposed glossary (Friday, 5 January)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Telecon 4 January 2000 (Wednesday, 3 January)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 4 Janaury 2001 (Wednesday, 3 January)
• UA Update (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420 (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Proposal: Merge checkpoints about text foreground and background colors (4.3/4.4) (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Issue 324: Proposal for revised checkpoint 6.2 (Tuesday, 2 January)

Leonard R. Kasday

• Re: Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG (Friday, 9 February)

Martin Duerst

• Re: Responses to Martin Duerst (I18N) issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 19 March)

Mickey Quenzer

• Fw: (Access-Mozilla) Re: Accessibility API plans and cross-reference (Tuesday, 6 February)

oedipus@hicom.net

• Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints (Thursday, 8 March)
• Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations (Thursday, 22 February)
• technique suggestion for UAAG 6.2 (Tuesday, 9 January)

Patrick Schmitz

• RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 27 February)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: Scheduling (third) last call review for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 March)

Phill Jenkins

• Re: Responses to Phill Jenkins issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 March)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• RE: Question for Tim Lacy (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Question for Tim Lacy (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Summary of UA discussion with CSS WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• MPEG 4 (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Mouse activate JavaScript (Thursday, 15 February)

Rob & Toni Seiler

• Marking image-maps (Wednesday, 21 February)

T. V. Raman

• Alert to guide-dog users travelling to Europe-- (Friday, 26 January)

Tim Lacy

• RE: Question for Tim Lacy (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Mouse Snap/Zap functionality (Thursday, 15 February)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Re: Scheduling (third) last call review for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Wednesday, 28 March)

William Loughborough

• Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events (Friday, 9 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2001 14:24:00 UTC