W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Meaning of "important special case"

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:47:01 -0500
Message-ID: <3A709ED5.6FFCA3FE@w3.org>
To: "Hansen, Eric" <ehansen@ets.org>
CC: "UA List (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
"Hansen, Eric" wrote:
> 
> I can see what you are saying, but it sort of begs the question, "If it is
> so 'important' and 'special', why isn't it _at least_ as important (in terms
> of priority) as the checkpoint of which it is a special case?"
> 
> I tend to think of a special case as a 'subset' or a closer look at
> something and that an 'important' special case would be at least as
> important in terms of 'priority'.....
> 
> Maybe we should say that checkpoint 9.6 (P3) is an "_unimportant_ special
> case" of checkpoint 9.3 (P2)....!?

Or just "special case"

 - Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 16:48:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC