W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2001

AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 4 Janaury 2001

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 11:39:58 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
WAI UA Telecon for January 4th, 2001

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 4 January 2001
Time: 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm Eastern Standard Time, USA
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038


Review Open Action Items (details below)


   1.Next User Agent face-to-face meeting in Boston on 1-2 March 2001


   1.Looking for a UA representative at coordination group meeting on 27 
Feburary at all working group meeting in

   2.Update on glossary group formed in WCAG

   3.Update on joint meetings at all working group meeting

   4.Issue #421: Checkpoint 8.6: Clarification about intent required.

   5.Issue #422: Checkpoint 8.8: Clarification of usage of terms active 
element/focus + techniques

   6.Issue #423: Checkpoint 9.3: Need min requirement for how/where conf 
information presented.

   7.Issue #424: Checkpoint 9.3: Do author-specified shortcuts include 
active elements that take mouse input?

   8.Issue #425: Checkoint 9.5: Need to emphasize more why different from 9.4

   9.Issue #426: Checkpoint 9.8: Clarify that brief sequences satisfy this 

  10.Issue #427: Checkpoint 10.1: HTML is not only accessible format

  11.Issue #428: Checkpoint 10.5: Add requirement that changes that affect 
accessibility be part of dedicated
     documentation (10.4)

  12.Issue #429: New requirement: documentation of API for querying 

  13.Issue #430: Checkpoint 3.2: Animations, not just animated images

Open Action Items

   1.WG: look for user agents that implement mouse events like mouse over 
with the keyboard.

   2.IJ: Follow up with Greg Lowney on issue 389

   3.IJ: (Issue 387) Propose new wording for check point 8.4 reflecting 
discussion on 28 November

   4.IJ: Ask Jason White for CSS implementation information for emacspeak

   5.IJ: Publish new implementation report for the meeting

   6.IJ: Improve wording of note for 4.14 related to CSS reference

   7.IJ, EH, AG: Propose new definitions forterms in question (equivalence, 
text element, etc.)

   8.IJ: Draft new language for 6.2

   9.IJ: Get wording from Martin for thisrequirement (e.g., "conform", 
"implement", etc.) for issue 327

  10.IJ: Propose new checkpoints to see how it feels to harmonize the 
requirements related to comments in issue 348.

  11.IJ: Propose new checkpoints/modifiedcheckpoints for 8.2.

  12.IJ: Add some more explanation about the difference between 7.3 and7.4.

  13.IJ: Proposed fixed wording for 7.5

  14.IJ: Add to techniques a link to Adobe's accessible PDF information.

  15.IJ and AG: Revise the applicability provision and send to WG.

  16.IJ: Ask Adobe why this is hard (issue 382)

  17.IJ: 1.4 needs to be re-written in light of changes in checkpoint 1.1.

  18.IJ: Proposed text in 2.1

  19.IJ: Add a note to 5.8 - content requirements may also apply to user 

  20.IJ: Mention that resizing and overiding absolute values is part of 
some specification in section 1.2

  21.IJ: Clarify the meaning of system colors

     a) clarify "recognize style" in checkpoints 4.5
     b) need more rational - refer to WCAG - style less important than 
other content
     c) add note 4.5 - give example of multimedia content that can be 
recognized as style

  23.IJ: Add technique to checkpoint 4.12 to make clear that:
     - This includes author-override if speech engine allows.
     - This includes whatever granularity offered by speech engine.

  24.IJ: Add a clarifying note to 4.11 that if you allow independent 
control of all sources of audio, you satisfy the
     checkpoint as well.

  25.IJ: Add a P3 checkpoint on user control of windows that automatically 

  26.IJ: Add a clarification to checkpoint 4.20 including:
         If a viewport includes other viewports, then this requirement only 
applies to the topmost viewport.
         Add a Note that other requirements still apply to sub-viewports

  27.IJ: Delete second sentence from 4.21

  28.IJ: Add to end of first sentence "with which it overlaps" in 
checkpoint 4.21

  29.IJ: Add "that benefit accessibility" to end of second sentence of 
checkpoint 5.8

  30.IJ: Put a note in the definition of active element that this does not 
include selection. (optional clarification note)

  31.IJ: Include selection and focus in note after 1.1 as examples of what 
must be done.

  32.IJ: Evaluate whether silent or invisible rendering has an impact on 
checkpoints other than 7.5 (search).

  33.JG: Implementation information for guideline 2

  34.JG: Propose a list of things we areexpecting UAs to recognize in scripts.

  35.JG: Schedule face-to-face time with other WGs (need to contact voice 
and mobile)

  36.JG: Propose text for the techniques document about synthesized speech 
implementation issues. Notably UA and AT    wanting to use the same 
synthesizer engine.

  37.JG: Propose resolution of issue 421

  38.GR: Review checkpoints in Guideline 10 for implementation information

  39.GR: Talk to Håkon about CSS support.

  40.GR: Talk to AFB about captioning and positioning

  41.JA: Review checkpoints in Guideline 4 for implementation information

  42.MQ: Send more details about control of speech parameters for the 
techniques document based on OpenBook.

  43.KB: Submit technique on providing information on current item and 
number of items in search

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 12:38:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:29 UTC